Wow, June is flying by, already the
19th and I've failed to get a blog article posted so far this month. However,
it wasn't for lack of interesting questions coming in. I've had a few, but the
one I'm going to talk about this week has to do with carbon and manure.
There are a lot of reason that this
topic could come up, often times it is in the context of anaerobic digestion of
manures, or potentially using manures to build soil health and soil carbon
levels, or event about what the carbon footprint of a pig is. Today’s question
hits on all these a little bit as it was “of the carbon that we feed a pig,
where does it end up?”
To get this conversation started I’m
going to work from a paper by Drs. Steve Trabue and Brian Kerr (they work for
USDA ARS) and their work has often focused on the dietary impacts different
dietary feed ingredients, feeding practices, and ration manipulation techniques
have on odor and gas emissions from swine manure. They have a unique set-up
where they perform these studies, sort of a mini-pig barn simulator. Each pig
gets an individual pen with a slatted floor. Below that is a screen and funnel
system that helps separate the urine and the feces (because, well manure
science! that and its sometimes handy to have these fractions separate). Twice
per day the pigs are fed and the urine and feces are collected mixed together
and put into its own individual manure storage tank (you can see a picture of
their set-up below). In addition to that work they’ve also done some carbon,
nitrogen, and sulfur balancing to how much of these things being fed ends up in
the pig’s body, how much is in the manure, and how much is lost to gas
emissions. Their studies last about 40 days and start with fresh manure;
because of this their manure emissions for methane may be a little low, but
they still give a good starting point.
In their study that found that
about 9% of the carbon was in the manure when a pig was fed a standard
corn-soybean meal diet and about 15% of the carbon ended up in the manure when
the pig was fed a ration high in DDGS (dried distillers grains with soluble). This should be about what we’d expect as
adding more DDGS to the diet increases fiber, which isn’t digested by the
animal so it ends up being passed through and excreted. In both cases they
found that about 20% of the carbon fed to the pigs ended up in the meat; this
occurred regardless of diet in their study, but both diets were formulated to
provide the same energy. They then suggested that about 60% of the carbon fed
to the pig is respired and ends up as carbon dioxide emitted from the pi during
breathing. This leaves about 10% of the carbon to be emissions; however, their
measured emissions from the manure were about 25% of the fed carbon – sometimes
carbon balances are a little messy and in this case they measured more carbon
in the animal, the manure, and as manure emissions than the measured in the
fed.
Even still, I’d guess that their
manure carbon emissions were low – their manure is stored in a clean tank (no
inoculation) and for a relatively short period of time (about 40 days).
Methanogens are notoriously slow growing so in this study they didn’t have lots
of time to develop and consume that organic material in the manure and their
measured methane emissions are typically lower than what we’d see in a
production swine environment.
When we think about carbon emissions
from animal production we often focus on the methane, this is because it is a
much more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide (30 times more potent over
100-years). It’s also because we think all this carbon was recently CO2 anyway
since it was recently captured by a plant, so if it was all released as CO2 it
would be carbon neutral. To get an idea of home much methane we are getting
from the pig manure I’m going to talk about some of my work – I was really
interested in how much methane is coming from swine deep-pit manure storages.
For this work I developed a protocol for estimating how much methane is coming from
the manure. Rather than focusing on the method,
I’m going to talk about the results. What I found is that methane emissions
from the swine manure storages averaged 12.2 + 8.1 kg CH4 per animal space per
year. So lots of variation between sites, which isn’t too surprising
considering some pump and land apply their manure 2 times a year and some only
once per year. To get an idea of how much methane was being produced from
manure per animal I’ve included a figure below. This shows the estimate of
methane emission from the manure, but also how variable it was from farm to
farm in our measurements.
The last why you can get at this question is with some BMP
(biochemical methane potential data). Typically, pigs excrete manure that is
about 8% solids (6% volatile solids) and it will have a methane production
potential of about 0.375 m3 CH4/kg volatile solids. A finishing pig should
excrete about 50 kg VS in a finishing barn over its live, so you are looking at
a potential of about 18.75 kg CH4 per finished pig. That would be your maximum
potential. In a deep-pit manure storage by the time we pump and land apply the
manure only about 0.135 m3 CH4/kg volatile solids potential remains in the
manure, about 6.75 kg CH4 per finished pig. This means that about 12 kg CH4 per
finished pig should have been produced, which jives pretty well with the
methane number above.
So where does this leave us and what does it mean? There are
lots of ways to go with this in the future. First it gives us a baseline for
how much carbon the pig will digest and retain for growth. In animal production
systems this is a variable we are always trying to improve. New research on how
to increase digestibility will continue to make this better in the future, even
now we are continuing to find ways to grind the feed finer without creating new
problems (like dust or the feed bridging in feeders) and doing this improves digestion
in the pit.
However, from my perspective the bigger question is how can
this change how we handle manure – and the answers are endless. If we move
towards systems where we can capture the methane we will need to ask questions
about how to get as much methane from the manure as possible; however, if we
continue with systems where we aren’t capturing the emissions we will instead need
to find ways to limit how much methane is lost. The good news is we already
know there is a big variation between barn-to-barn and farm-to-farm in these emissions;
however, answers as to why remain elusive. Getting to the cause of these
differences will help in develop of best practices to meet our manure
objectives of today, and tomorrow.
