Impermeable covers minimize odor and limit ammonia emissions. Covers prevent rainfall from mixing with manure, making manure production volumes more consistent from year to year, reducing the chance of overflow, and providing the potential for methane capture, reducing the farm's environmental footprint. These opportunities indicate that covered manure storage should be favored, yet incorporating impermeable covers has been minimal. Many resources suggest the potential benefits of impermeable covers, but a thorough economic evaluation of benefits is lacking, with the existing tools predating the development of RIN and LCFS Carbon Credit Markets. These markets are game-changing in the potential opportunities they offer. With this in mind, we developed a model to estimate how covers would impact the spreading costs, fertilizer value, biogas production, and carbon credits a farm receives and evaluate implications for Iowa livestock farms.
With that in mind, I've been putting together some estimates
of the value covers and potential costs. Many assumptions are involved in these
estimates, and hopefully, a future extension publication will walk through some
of the calculations. Here we provide a comprehensive economic exploration of
the value impermeable covers offer, focused on illustrating both perceived
values and those that are the definitive economic drivers in the current
marketplace. We looked at three example farms, a 4800-head swine finishing farm
starting with deep pit manure storage, a 4800-head swine finishing farm
starting with a drain pit and out-of-barn slurry storage, and a 500-head dairy
with out-of-barn manure storage. We calculated the cost of modifying the
facility to add a cover at each farm and the potential cost savings provided
with current economic and carbon credit-based incentives. Evaluations assumed a
5-year or 10-year life with interest set at 8%.
Results are shown in table 1. In general, when all potential
values are considered, both the 4800 head swine and the 500 head dairy using
lagoon, earthen basin, or out-of-barn manure storage were cost feasible within
five years and had net annual incomes of $50,000-$70,000 within five years.
Economics didn't appear as favorable at deep pit facilities as construction
costs for manure storage modifications increased cost. Combined with a higher
carbon intensity score on methane, this produced limited payback opportunities.
Table 1. Estimated
cost-benefit ratio for covers at livestock facilities creating CNG.
|
5-year
life |
10-year
life |
||||
Facility
Type |
4800
swine |
4800
swine |
500
head dairy |
4800
swine |
4800
swine |
500
head dairy |
deep
pit |
lagoon |
deep
it |
lagoon |
|||
Methane
Value |
$44,661
|
$44,661
|
$44,030
|
$44,661
|
$44,661
|
$44,030
|
LCFS
Value |
$199,352
|
$420,744
|
$414,804
|
$199,352
|
$420,744
|
$414,804
|
RIN
Value |
$283,311
|
$283,311
|
$279,312
|
$283,311
|
$283,311
|
$279,312
|
Nitrogen
Value Savings |
$5,635
|
$4,827
|
$2,401
|
$5,635
|
$4,827
|
$2,401
|
Odor
Reduction |
$6,900
|
$6,900
|
$884
|
$6,900
|
$6,900
|
$884
|
Storage
Construction Savings |
$0
|
$1,226
|
$2,427
|
$0
|
$729
|
$1,444
|
Manure
Application Costs |
($2,674) |
$398
|
$2,845
|
($2,674) |
$398
|
$2,845
|
Carbon
Credits from N2O |
($770) |
($2,690) |
$554
|
($770) |
($2,690) |
$554
|
Pipeline
Injection Point |
$250,457
|
$250,457
|
$250,457
|
$149,029
|
$149,029
|
$149,029
|
Biogas
Cleaning & Compression Equipment |
$186,254
|
$186,254
|
$183,624
|
$110,827
|
$110,827
|
$109,262
|
Biogas
Cleaning & Compression Maintenance |
$74,366
|
$74,366
|
$73,316
|
$74,366
|
$74,366
|
$73,316
|
Biogas
Cleaning Operation |
$11,018
|
$11,018
|
$10,862
|
$11,018
|
$11,018
|
$10,862
|
Biogas
Management Employee |
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
$80,000
|
LCFS/RIN
Sales Fees (10%) |
$48,266
|
$70,405
|
$69,412
|
$48,266
|
$70,405
|
$69,412
|
Manure
Storage Construction |
$102,391
|
$0
|
$0
|
$60,926
|
$0
|
$0
|
Annualized
Cover Installation Cost |
$13,948
|
$13,948
|
$22,126
|
$8,300
|
$8,300
|
$13,166
|
Cover
Maintenance Cost |
$5,569
|
$5,569
|
$8,834
|
$5,569
|
$5,569
|
$8,834
|
Rainfall
Removal |
$14
|
$14
|
$28
|
$14
|
$14
|
$28
|
Annual
Benefit |
$536,415
|
$759,377
|
$747,257
|
$536,415
|
$758,880
|
$746,274
|
Annual
Expense |
$772,283
|
$692,031
|
$698,659
|
$548,315
|
$509,528
|
$513,909
|
Net
Benefit |
($235,868) |
$67,346
|
$48,598
|
($11,900) |
$249,352
|
$232,365
|
These results are highly dependent on a farm scale and
assumed covered manure storage, not the implementation of an anaerobic
digester. Next month we'll look closely at the role farm size plays. In
November we'll look at how heated digester systems compare to impermeable
covers.
No comments:
Post a Comment